Article

6 alternatives to Google Photos

Six practical alternatives to Google Photos, with what each does best and how to choose a replacement for storing and backing up your pictures.

by Whatsnew Newsroom

If you want to move your photo and video library away from one provider, or you simply want a service that suits your habits better, there are several sensible alternatives. Below are six options that people commonly choose and what each does well — plus a short checklist to help you pick.

What to look for in a Google Photos replacement

- Storage model: free tier, paid tiers, or unlimited for specific users. Check how much is included and how extra storage is charged. - Sync and apps: does it have automatic upload from phone, desktop sync, and a web interface? - File types and limits: some services treat photos and videos differently; others are general file stores. - Privacy and sharing: can you keep albums private, share links, or control who sees what? - Backup and restore: does the service offer true backup (versioning, device restore) or only sync? - Exportability: make sure you can download or export your library should you want to leave.

Six alternatives to consider

Facebook - Many people already use Facebook to store images and videos in albums. The platform lets you control album visibility, so uploads can be kept private rather than public. It’s a convenient option if you already use the service, but remember it’s designed for social sharing first — read the privacy settings before relying on it as long-term storage.

iCloud - If you’re invested in the Apple ecosystem, Apple’s cloud storage is tightly integrated with iPhone, iPad and Mac. That integration makes automatic syncing and freeing up device space very convenient. iCloud is a natural choice when most of your devices are Apple devices.

Dropbox - Dropbox began as a general file-syncing tool rather than a photo service, and that still shows in its strengths: solid desktop sync, easy file organisation, and support for many file types. It’s a practical choice if you want your photos stored alongside other documents and files and you value reliable syncing across devices.

Amazon Photos - Amazon’s photo service is focused on image and video storage with apps for mobile and desktop. It’s a good option to consider if you already use Amazon’s ecosystem, as the service often integrates with other Amazon services. It supports standard photo organisation features such as albums and basic sharing.

IDrive - IDrive markets itself as a backup-first service that covers multiple platforms. If you want a solution that can back up entire devices, preserve multiple versions of files, and restore folders or whole systems, a backup-focused provider like this is worth investigating. It tends to suit people who want a comprehensive disaster-recovery option rather than just photo hosting.

Degoo - Degoo pitches itself as a photo-friendly cloud with an emphasis on large free allowances and simple automatic uploads. It’s aimed at people who want straightforward, automatic backup of camera-roll photos without fuss. As with any service, check the small-print on device limits and how video files are handled.

Choosing and moving your library

Before you commit, try a short test: upload a few albums, test the apps, confirm sharing and privacy settings, and try to export a sample set of images. Also consider keeping at least one local backup — an external drive or NAS — so you’re not dependent on a single cloud provider. That mix of cloud convenience and local control is the simplest way to protect your photos for the long term.

by Whatsnew Newsroom
whatsnew. APPS · WEB TOOLS · SECURITY · AI

Know what’s new.

The useful side of the internet. Covered properly.

Set as preferred →